Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Response to Tate Tanks






As a response to the Tate Tanks feedback wall, I begin to wonder if I can study interaction in a more simplistic way. Could the question, or the process of questioning be a basis for artwork? If I use a simple question to gather more questions I can potentially generate a candid forum between the maker and the audience.

This initial projection will be installed in a party. 80% of the people there will be MA students, and the rest creative practitioners.

I then intend to study the questions (or whatever they produce). I imagine that I will select some to project in a variety of locations as appropriate.

Monday, 14 January 2013

RESEARCH: Tate Tanks extra

Having watched this report on the Tate Tanks:

Do Tate Modern's oil tanks live up to the hype?

I am inclined to agree with the presenter Alistair Sooke when he suggests that the space has a lot to live up to and that the hype could be problematic and possibly pollutant for the work shown in the space.

That said, on visiting the Tanks it was genuinely exciting to see work displayed in such an established gallery with no white walls in sight. In essence, the space is not a white cube and therefore cannot be approached in that way by the artist. Considering context has yet again become fashionable.

Sunday, 13 January 2013

Research: London trip 5th Jan 2013


What Does Participation Mean to You?
Footfall, Anonymity and response in the Tate Modern.


When someone told me recently that the Tate Modern was the most popular art gallery in the world I wasn’t really surprised[1]. Anyone who has visited it on a Friday afternoon must have observed escalators brimming with school kids, businessmen on lunch breaks and tourists donning ponchos outnumbering the odd art student who has wandered in.  Its sheer scale suggests that it has the capability to accommodate as many visitors as can be thrown at it. That said, it did occur to me that maintaining a relationship with each visitor and opening up avenues for communication and forum is something of which the team at Tate Modern can be proud. Their simplistic and stylish approach to feedback is worth studying for anyone who has ever wondered what the audience really thinks of their efforts.




 Take for example this wall (above) in the recently opened Tate Tanks: an exhibition space dedicated to performance and participation. The visitor is invited to post comments using sticky notes in response to the question “what does participation mean to you?” Simply put, it is an analogue version of the Facebook wall.

Thinking aesthetically, the more comments posted, the better it looks. Enigmatically, the question posed is displayed as a light projection – it is not physical and seems to have less gravitas than the written paper responses. That the audience can physically and deliberately interrupt the question by placing their comments on the screen also indicates a careful exploration of the hierarchy between the established gallery and the transient audience.

Of course, what is most interesting about this corner of the Tanks is what visitors choose to write. I asked myself as I spent a considerable amount of time perusing the notes: Can you tell anything about the audience from what they write? Are the notes stuck on the bottom added by children and the ones at the top by giants? Can you tell just by the handwriting what age they are, what kind of education they have had? Are the ones on the periphery more valuable than the ones in the middle? What happens if I steal some notes and take them home?…..

In the end it is probably more interesting for you to look at them yourself. Below are some of the comments that caught my eye. Please bear in mind that I’m only 5ft 2in and that this variable has coloured my overall reading of the wall. 

Comments read left to right: